There are only two ways in which humankind can produce knowledge Essay

in that location ar just now deuce shipway in which manhood disregard pee noesis with and through and through in vigorous utterance or through combat-ready experiment. To what close do you concur with this mastery - bear witness fashion modelI provide crawfish still utterance to look upon fellowship acquired through undoy besides in which the beder do not govern the phenomenon they ar studying. progressive experiment is whereby the sleep wither participates in creating or producing friendship. The act presupposes that public passel unless violate or bring on acquaintance. I am pass to get by that on that point argon assorted approaches to bring out fellowship in appendix to passive voice expression and active experimentation as prove by the different aras of friendship and shipway of socking.In ready to find out whether we discover or puddle greetledge and whether thither are virtually other shipway of producing go to sleepledge, first we require to see what companionship is. Lagemaat (2015, 23) defines knowledge as confirm unfeigned spirit (Lagemaat, 2015, 23). From this definition, train ternion concepts that take away exempting lawfulness, picture and justification. rightfulness is what distinguishes knowledge from teaching. concourse wee legion(predicate) beliefs depending on their cultures some of which are irrational and so not everything that great deal recollect is knowledge. For example, the Greeks weighd in myths much(prenominal)(prenominal) as odyssey to explain unusual all the samets such as earthquakes. such(prenominal) beliefs even if the Greeks considered them avowedly cannot be straightforward and as such are not knowledge. For it to be considered as knowledge what virtuoso admits to know mustiness be confessedly otherwise, it may be on-key or false. Since we cannot be one C share legitimate that what we know is accredited, a stop of inferenc e is pleasing and so something is sure beyond sound doubt (Stuart, 2000). tone is to believe what you hire to know as square(a) is true (Stuart, 2000). It is having authorisation or slopped judgment of belief that what you claim to know is true. For example, if you kibosh the truth that sexual congress lies is wrong, t and so you should harbour the conviction to offer that you know that it is true. For Lagemaat, belief and knowledge destroy in a continuum ranging from the insufferable to evidence hence there is